🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly enabling the radical right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent research carried out in Germany.

Researchers discovered that this trend has inadvertently benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core themes like assimilation and migration, established parties progressively adapted their messaging in response.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to voters that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by mainstream political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was evident even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the study was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to affect countries across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European news outlets," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also hardened their discourse to match that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a former German chancellor called for large-scale deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found throughout Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic embrace the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on migration.

This has created an echo chamber that would have been unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Some parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the far right, even as studies suggests that this approach leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of information collected revealed that the impact of radical parties had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you encounter this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Established Parties to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The research highlighted the necessity for established political parties to carve out their distinct discourses, especially on topics such as migration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."